Reform Social and Grill

I first visited Mandeville Hotel’s restaurant some time ago when it was Deville, a bold, glitzy chaise-loungey afair of chandeliers, silver-grey and muted pastels whose bar looked like something Butlins would have considered ‘modern’ in 1999. At the time I sampled a delicious tonka bean cocktail from their imaginative cocktail menu, which, as a then tonka virgin, definitely left me impressed.

Today, Deville has been replaced by Reform bar and social which their website describes as quintessentially British, taking inspiration from classic British gentlemen’s clubs.

Entering the bar which looked distinctly like a low-budget replica of a train station boozer, I couldn’t help feeling they were doing ‘brittishness’ a disservice. Wildly patterned carpet lined the floor on which Harvester style tub chairs sat lonely in the dark but for a small ikea-esque table and and single candle. Empty and characterless, the only thing missing was the smell of stale long since smoked tobacco and the sound of the 5.45 to Streatham blaring over the top.

Seconds after we’d sat down, an immaculately presented waiter approached the table and jokingly offered me a Bloody Mary, a reference to my allergies. We’d advised of my allergies to onion and tomato when I booked to make sure the meal included in our Groupon voucher would be suitable. Declining the Bloody Mary, we commented on how refreshing it was to see that the allergies were so well communicated among the team that even the bar staff knew.

As our Groupon for dinner included a bottle of wine, we opted for a virgin cocktail each. There were only three to chose from but they all sounded delicious, and I selected an Earl Fizz comprising orange and lime juice, raspberries, earl grey syrup and soda water. Boyfriend opted for an English Garden, comprising apple juice, lime, mint and grapefruit syrup. Both were perfectly palatable and just what we needed, even if I was slightly baffled why my drink had no sign of raspberry and came garnished with redcurrants instead.

We moved through to the dining area, hungry for our two course lobster burger or steak meal. We were tended to immediately by a maitre d’ who made reference to my allergies again and swept away our coats before handing us over to a sweet faced gentleman who seated us.

My decision on a starter was easy: baked golden cross goats cheese, mustard leaf and truffle honey. Boyfriend opted for a ham hock and watercress salad, a dish which, if you believe the spelling of the online menu, includes real warts. 

Boyfriend was satisfied with his dish and mine was reasonable but neither were presented immaculately and the goats cheese had a rind which was so gritty as to make it a tad unpleasant. The honey was an interesting and tasty touch but overall the starter did leave me feeling a little like I’d sprinkled stale toast with honey over a bit of cheese I found at the back of the fridge, three weeks out of date.

Moving on to mains, we’d only a few choices on our Groupon – steak or lobster burger. We ordered one of each and a side of purple sprouting broccoli and supped on a glass of tasteless red while we waited. 

On its arrival I was amazed to find that my main course had been garnished with onion and tomato, the two things we’d advised I was allergic to when we booked. They’d advised that the only part of the dish that usually contained those ingredients was the garnish and that they’d do it without. I decided to just remove them and not raise it with the waiter.

The dish came with chunky fries which were perfectly salted and undeniably delicious but my burger, looked bizarre and anaemic like an under cooked Iceland chicken burger. What’s more, on writing this review I’ve learned that the burger is actually 67 per cent not lobster, comprising pollock and crayfish for the main part, but given what else I found in my meal, this pales into insignificance.

I was just contemplating whether the broccoli I’d been served was in fact purple sprouting broccoli as advertised given that it was not as thin, delicate and, well, sprout like, as it has been on every occasion I’ve had it previously, when I sensed an unfamiliar taste in my mouth. Poking the burger to the side, I found white sauce similar to tartar, dotted with green and white chunks. Putting my cutlery down and feeling suddenly clammy, I called the waiter over.

“Whatever it is, has the sauce got onion in it? I’m allergic to onion and I’ve eaten some so of it, we were told this dish would be fine for me, but it tastes like onion.”

The waiter looked fearful and nearly ran to the kitchen. 

When he returned, he explained that the sauce had shallots in it. 

“Please, you must make sure you tell me if you have an allergy.” 

We reiterated that we’d already advised of my allergies and been told it would be fine, then been told by the maitre d’ and the bar staff that they were aware. At this, the waiter sighed and apologised, asking if I felt ok. I didn’t. I was sweating and my face was burning up.

The waiter offered to bring me a new burger without sauce or garnish and disappeared looking as though he was about to cry.

Suddenly an older, smartly suited man appeared at the table.

“I understand you have had some problem with your dish,” he said serenely but seriously.

“You have allergies,” he half-stated, half-asked.

“I know what will fix this.” he said, this time making a definite statement.

I sat up straight giving him my full attention, this could be revelatory, after all, I’ve had allergies since I was 16 and none of the three hospitals or six specialists I’ve seen have ever figured out how to fix it! What wonder that a smartly suited restaurant employee might hold the answer…

“White wine.” he said.

Oh. Not quite the groundbreaking medical advice I was hoping for.

“I can’t drink white wine.” I responded.

Doing well not to roll his eyes, the man proceeded:

“Champagne? It’s all in the bubbles you see.”

I accepted, and the man, who I can only assume was the manager, then offered me any meal from the main menu in replacement of a sauceless lobster burger. Then, as quick as he had arrived, he disappeared again. 

Shortly after, sweet faced waiter man surfaced, still looking as though he was on the verge of a nervous break down, but in a way absolutely fitting of someone who has unwittingly potentially injured a customer. He gave us a glass of champagne each and apologised again, taking my replacement order of fish and chips- not what I wanted but the only straight forward safe thing on the menu.

The fish was delicious. Totally fresh and the batter was deliciously crispy. They even made me special mushy peas without onion. They accompanied it with another dish of “purple sprouting broccoli” which I still was not convinced of, and more scrumptious chips.

When the bill came, as you’d expect, we’d not been charged for the champagne, extra meal, or sides but the bill did come to around £75 including the cost of the groupon voucher.

I know this is Marylebone, so you shouldn’t expect to get much for your pound, but I definitely didn’t feel like I’d got a deal on what was essentially, pub grub, served in a place with less ambience than a library and worse decor than a Travelodge would have had in the 70’s.

For it to have replicated a gentleman’s club, it would need to have been more sensitively lit, creating cosy corners with a smokey elegance. As it was, the most British thing about Reform bar and grill was the eccentricity with which we were served, and the polite and charming way in which the manager appeared and attempted to rectify the situation.

Would I go back? Despite the near death experience, thanks to the way they handled their mistake, I probably would venture back, but only if I had a deal or voucher, otherwise, I really can’t see this being worth the money.



If your first experience of Bawarchi was their website, you could be forgiven for having high expectations.


Apparently Bawarchi translates as ‘The Master Chef’, an experienced expert. Ironically, this was undoubtedly the worst experience I have ever had at the hands of any chef, at any restaurant.


I arrived at Bawarchi with my boyfriend and his mother for a celebratory meal. We were the only customers and the man loitering behind the counter tended to us immediately, seating us on the kind of purple and red chairs usually sold in pop up furniture outlets squatting in disused Christmas shops.


The table was plainly laid with a white cotton table cloth and the cheap, twee blue ringed crockery jarred wildly with strange painting-sculpture hybrid wall hangings nearby. 


As we were seated we told the waiter of my allergies and he explained proudly that the food was all freshly made to order so my allergies could of course be accommodated.


Deciding on Butter Chicken, I called the waiter over and reiterated that onion and tomato would land me in hospital if I consumed them, then asked if a version of butter chicken would be viable without those ingredients. He assured me it would be fine.


Within twenty minutes, the food was served and I was surprised to find that mine was a dull red colour. Without eating a bite I called the waiter over, aware I was fast becoming a terror to him, and checked that there was definitely no onion or tomato. He reassured me, no onion or tomato, definitely not.


“What’s in it then?” asked boyfriend’s mother.


“Chicken” said the waiter, who, despite his response, we sadly suspected wasn’t trying to be sarcastic.


“But what actually makes it red” said boyfriend.


“Food colouring” said the waiter with absolutely no shame or concern.


Six mouthfuls in, my boyfriend eyed me across the table as I suspiciously pushed sauce around my plate. I explained that I couldn’t fathom what the sauce was made of; I had hoped that it was cream or coconut, coloured by chilli or spices but the texture just didn’t add up.


My very tolerant boyfriend proceeded to call over the waiter and check again that there was no tomato. He was told no.


 “Sorry, but what actually makes the sauce then?” I interjected, wary of being the most irritating customer ever.


“It’s pretty serious an allergy” chimed in my boyfriend


“Can you find out? I’d just like to know so I can recreate sauces myself that are allergy safe!” I said trying to lighten the mood.


The waiter who, by now, was one stage off rolling his eyes said it was definitely not tomato but he could ask the chef what the sauce was made from and promptly disappeared into the kitchen.


Two minutes later the waiter strolled casually into the dining room.


“Chef advises you to stop eating that” he said, gesturing meekly towards my dish.


“Why?” said all of us in unison.


“Because the sauce has tomatoes in” he responded with a remarkable calmness.


“Butter chicken is made with a tomato base”


“But we told you she was allergic, you said it would be fine to make a variation, if it wasn’t possible you should have told us, not served it to her” my boyfriend responded, gobsmacked.




The waiter proceeded to wave his order pad in front of us “I wrote it down, no onion or tomato, but

chef just thought I meant garnish.”


Clearly the waiter had not advised the chef that it was an allergy and clearly, it was to much to ask of the chef, hard pushed as he was serving an empty restaurant, to  have clarified the waiter’s request. 


Either way, it was beside the point for me who now faced an almost certain medical disaster.


Immediately descending into panic mode, boyfriend and I abandoned his mum and hurried back to his where I established that I hadn’t sufficient medication for such a catastrophe and, given it was  a Sunday, that my boyfriend now had a long night ahead of him finding an out of hours service to provide it. 


I was in the bathroom, attempting to rid myself of the food when boyfriend’s mum arrived home and delivered the punchline; as she had gone to leave the waiter had asked if she wanted to take the leftovers. Hating waste, she accepted, and bafflingly they then wrapped up my abandoned dish, discarded all other remaining food then proceeded to charged her for all of the meals, saying that, as she was taking the butter chicken, she should pay for it too.


Hearing this my boyfriend took the bag of leftover butter chicken and returned to the restaurant demanding a refund. Astonishingly, the manager, who had surfaced by this point, stated that the dish always has tomato, as though we should have expected to be served it regardless of how many conversations we’d had with the waiter where he has reassured us otherwise.


My boyfriend explained that we had told the waiter that it was an allergy and the waiter had understood this, even repeating it back to us, we also explained that we had been told that a unique version was to be made for me.


The manager consequently refunded the butter chicken and cooked a new dish for me. But I found out later, when I awoke from my medicated haze, that Bawarchi had still charged for boyfriend and his mother’s meals even though the evening had been ruined by their incompetence and much of the food had not been eaten.


Bawarchi’s website declares that they provide high levels of satisfaction to  customers. I left feeling I had suffered an attack both physically and financially, been disrespected and disregarded. Bawarchi’s website also says they let their cuisine forge its own reputation.  They certainly achieved that.


The restaurant website states that the management are ‘extremely swollen’ and I can only think they also aim to ensure their allergic customers are too. One to avoid at all costs.



I’d walked past the sister restaurant to Les Deux Salons and Wild Honey many a time. While facinated by Abutus’ ability to use previously ill-regarded cuts of meat and still change handsomely for them, dishes such as crispy  trotters, pigs head and tripe never quite had the pull needed to get me through the door.
This  time, however, I felt like something different and,  before I knew it, I’d moved from the broodingly lit menu on the dark and inviting restaurant front through the door and into Arbutus’ surprisingly classy-minimalist interior.

Greeted immediately by a black suited woman I was shown to my table and invited to choose from an extensive drinks list whose starring feature was the availability of wine by the 250ml carafe. Soon after, I was availed of piece of bread from the most polite basket wielding gentleman I have ever had the pleasure of meeting which I nibbled on while arriving at the choice of a Squid and mackerel ‘burger’ for starters. 


At around £11 I had high expectations for this fish fix but sadly, while the colours were vibrant and the dish presented perfectly,with a slightly gritty, suspiciously loose texture and overly fishy aftertaste the flavour left a lot to be desired.
Unfortunately, the perfectly plain dining room had little to distract me, with its selection of wooden topped, metal posted, and aggressively tall  white tables standing somewhat clinically against plain white walls and  monochrome prints offering little more than a hint of french cafe character.

On to the main course, I ordered cod with grilled razor clams and sea purslane (£18) and was, yet again, disappointed. While it was perfectly palatable it was certainly not a delight and the presentation of the dish was much as ones meal might be having been retrieved unthinkingly from a refrigerator side on, the night after it was made.

All in all, I could not fault the service which was slick, polite and appropriate. But the soulless dining room in stark contrast to its outside appearance and below par food was certainly not worth the not-insignificant price tag. Not one I’ll be returning to in a hurry.

Pollen Street Social

Ok, I’m just going to put this out there. I really don’t ‘get’ Pollen Street Social.

Down an easily missed and narrow road in Marylebone, sits the first restaurant venture of ex-Gordon Ramsay-ite, James Atherton. Pitched as a “contemporary bistro offering de-formalised fine dining” I had high hopes for an atmospheric, relaxed but entirely delicious meal.

 Greeted at seven o’clock on a Wednesday evening by a lady stood in front of a wall of numbered, metal mini-safes (weird) I was advised that there were no tables free, but I could order from the full menu at the bar, I accepted and took my seat at the pale wooden bar. Immediately underwhelmed I wondered if I’d accidentally stumbled into a recently painted slug and lettuce, but was reassured I was in the right place when  a member of bar staff began the seemingly obligatory ‘talking to lone diners is part of my job’ conversation with me.

This might have been interesting, or jaw clenchingly boring, I’ll never know; I could barely hear the member of staff as, despite his proximity, the canteen-chatter and clanging drowned him out.

I ordered a water and glass of house red which I stupidly expected to be Vin de Pays Des Collines Rhodaniennes Syrah (at £6.50) but which transpired to be the Pollen Street Social Sélection, Anjou, Clos de l’Elu, Loire Valley (at £8.50).

Quickly a waiter arrived with a small piece of bread and shortly after, another waiter presented me with several small bowls of entirely unidentifiable matter. Despite two attempts at asking, over the canteen sounds I still had no idea what they were. 

One thing’s for sure though, as I’d been seated half under a bar lamp and the bar was relatively narrow, irritatingly, there was nowhere for me to put my glass let alone get at the ‘bowls-of-something’.

I looked around for cutlery. None. What the hell was I supposed to do with them with no cutlery? Suddenly a brainwave, I pulled out my phone, read another diners review and, thank god, discovered that the delights before me were dips and spreads. Salt cod brandade and apple and ginger dip, to be precise. For my one small piece of bread. I tasted them, both passable, neither impressive, and with no offer of bread seconds, most was wasted anyway.  

No starters took my fancy so I skipped straight to mains and ordered Roasted Creedy Carver duck, spice pear gel, braised duck leg, turnip, English Ale-Gar reduction. No, I don’t know what Ale-Gar is either but given that I’d, so far, not understood a single word that the waiting staff had uttered I opted to pray it wasn’t tomato and order it anyway.

The food arrived and was perfectly edible, The duck was reasonably cooked and pleasant, if a little fatty and the pear flavours sat well alongside, but then pear and duck is hardly rocket science. It wasn’t spectacular and I’ve actually had far more flavoursome duck at Cote up the road from my house in Surrey. Certainly not something I’d want to spend a pretty wholesome £30 on again. 

I hoped the magic might be in the desserts, and, when I managed to finally understand something a waiter said to me, I felt it was a sign I should go with their recommendation of 70% Chocolate ganache, banana ice cream, sesame crumble, Pedro Ximenez, chocolate coral. Again, no, I don’t know what the Pedro thing is, or why its capitalized, but went ahead regardless. 

The ice cream was standard banana flavour, the ‘coral’ was like Iceland frozen chocolate mousse that had been hacked at wildly with a knife and then blasted with dry ice. The sesame was like a high end nutty breakfast cereal and the chocolate ganache was pleasing, but un-astoundingly so. 

All in all, for a total bill of £55 I was rather unimpressed, the food was fine, lovely even, but absolutely lack lustre.

Perhaps I chose the wrong things, perhaps I’d have received a more dazzling service if I’d sat at a restaurant table rather than the bar- according to reviews I’ve since read, I would then at least have received a magic key to one of the mini numbered safes and the ‘present inside’. 

But overall I felt let down; the reviews I’d read promised Pollen Street Social would be just the kind of restaurant I loved, paired down fine dining, with all of the taste and none of the stuffiness, formality and inflexibility of many high end restaurants. If this was the case, then perhaps the service was the problem; no one gave me choice of seating or even told me about the different areas, no one explained the restaurant’s ethos or told me about the cocktails. 

It’s one thing to pair down fine dining, but make sure you pair down the right bits, else you’ll end up a slug and lettuce selling overpriced duck and iceland mousses.



A dire week at work led me to this narrow doorway just off Regent Street. Before me, stood a man in glorious technicolor, a turquoise embroidered gown reflecting in the glow of his gold silk turban. Above him a rainbow of lanterns twinkled in the perfect antidote to the grey outside as I requested a table for one.

As I asked he gestured to his right, I followed his gaze and instantly the magic screen to the outside world was chinked. There sat a smartly dressed, yet distinctly un-embroidered young lady who, after a few words into a telephone, directed me down a short, narrow corridor to the lift. Inside, I couldn’t quite decide if the pink lighting was more exotic cocktail bar or erotic shop but by this time, so excited to discover the restaurant, I didn’t dwell on it. 

The doors slid open to reveal two more suited ladies behind a black reception desk who swiftly saw me  to my seat on a long couch with a view of Regents Street.  My overwhelming feeling, however, was that this place was conflicted. On one hand, with its polished maple tables, silverware and  white tablecloths, this felt like an impersonal, stiff upper lip, prim and proper fine dining restaurant, but its slightly grubby junkshop rug and smattering of more of the multicoloured lanterns I’d seen downstairs  suggested it was trying to create a certain ambience, an  authenticity which was quite opposite. 

The cocktail menu was frustratingly skinny, but I settled on a hibiscus drink which transpired to be little more than cheap fizz poured over a jar flower. Then I tackled the menu which I had anticipated being difficult for me as someone with allergies to onion and tomato, but, credit where its due, the manager proposed a suitable solution.

The starter,  Raj Kachor which was described as regal street food, was a large pastry puff decorated with herbs and jewel-like pomegranate, surrounded by a raiita and filled with a creamy, spicy vegetable mixture. The crispness of the pastry, zingyness of the pomegranate and spicy cream complemented each other but the portion was far too big and left me  feeling as though  I’d eaten five chicken coronation sandwiches. It did look good though.

By the end of this course I’d finished my drink but despite taking my plate not one waiter asked if I would like another until a good fifteen minutes later, something which was especially annoying given the number of waiters wandering around aimlessly or faffing over the precise position of a fork.

My main comprised a slightly strangely portioned set of two chicken breasts each stuffed with nuts and apricots. Having been convinced by the manager’s suggestion, I accompanied this with a selection of vegetables in a mustard rich sauce and traditional flaked bread. All were tasty but none overwhelmingly so.

Still a bit sickened by the size of the starter, I couldn’t eat everything, so decided to ask for a doggy bag when I got the bill. I hadn’t anticipated what a task this would be, fifteen minutes of trying to beckon a waiter over and finally one approached, only to respond to my doggy bag response by advising me he didn’t know because they were ‘very busy’. I surveyed the restaurant, noting several empty tables and wondered what their idea of quiet would be.

Fortunately, ten minutes later my packaged food was returned And the bill followed ten minutes later. The princely sum of £68. Overall I’d say this was a slightly better than average experience, where the pretty good food was overridden by their inflated prices and below par service.